Tom Keohane
Are you confused by the complexity around ESG and sustainability reporting requirements? Struggling to tell the difference between guidance and frameworks?
There’s a myriad of global guidance, regulation and reporting frameworks, which will apply to different organizations depending on size, industry and specific market or regions. It’s understandable that many leaders feel bewildered.
If you’re seeking to understand which requirements apply to your organization and how to best meet them, follow our cheat sheet guide to get started.
In our view, the right approach to ESG and sustainability reporting involves four key stages. At each stage, all organizations need to answer a fundamental question.
Broadly speaking, when assessing which ESG and sustainability reporting requirements apply to your specific organization, there are three main categories that you will need to consider.
Global guidance is issued by international bodies to provide counsel and direction, aligning all stakeholders on ESG and sustainability goals.
Prominent examples of global guidance include:
Regulation and legislation are issued at national and/or regional level, which mandates reporting on key ESG and sustainability-related information.
Examples of significant regulation and legislation include:
The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is an EU regulation, which aims to broaden the existing Non-Financial Reporting Directives (NFRD). CSRD is intended to help investors, civil society organizations, consumers and other stakeholders evaluate the sustainability performance of companies, as part of the European green deal.
Audience
All stakeholders
Focus
ESG
Outcome
External report
The Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) aims to improve transparency in the EU market for sustainable investment products, to prevent 'greenwashing' and to increase transparency around sustainability claims made by financial market participants.
Audience
All stakeholders
Focus
ESG, including double materiality
Outcome
External report
This globally leading piece of legislation sets out a range of measures on how to deal with modern slavery and human trafficking within the UK. If UK companies meet certain criteria, they must publish a Modern Slavery statement annually.
Audience
All stakeholders
Focus
Social
Outcome
External report (statement)
In the UK, Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) aims to make producers responsible for the cost of collecting, managing and recycling packaging and incentivize them to make their products recyclable by modulating fees based on the recyclability of products. It also aims to reduce unnecessary packaging, increase quality and reduce litter.
Audience
All stakeholders
Focus
Environmental
Outcome
External report
Trade bodies and associations may require reporting on ESG and sustainability data as part of their membership requirements.
Examples include:
B Lab, a global nonprofit network, offers B Corporation (Corp) Certification to companies which meet high standards of social and environmental performance, transparency, and accountability. To gain the B Corp designation, companies must submit to B Lab’s verification process, with recertification required every three years.
Audience
All stakeholders
Focus
Environmental
Outcome
Assessment and accreditation
The Ethical Trade Initiative (ETI) is a leading alliance of trade unions, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and companies, working together with key stakeholders to promote practical solutions to end the abuse of human rights at work.
Audience
All stakeholders
Focus
Social
Outcome
Assessment and accreditation
A reporting framework provides a set of standards to help you structure and report your ESG and sustainability information.
At present, there is no universally recognised reporting standard for ESG and sustainability, unlike in other areas such as financial reporting.
Instead, there are many to consider, with varying degrees of overlap. Some are linked to specific regulation or legislation and are designed to help organizations meet those specific mandates.
Examples include:
EU Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) outline the mandatory concepts and principles to which companies reporting under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) must align their sustainability statements.
Audience
All stakeholders
Focus
ESG, including double materiality
Outcome
External report
The EU Taxonomy provides a minimum standard across sustainability disclosure requirements, effectively creating a green investment rule book that specifies which investments can be considered sustainable.
Audience
All stakeholders, but focused on investors
Focus
ESG
Outcome
External report
The Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) provides guidance for organizations on what information and risks they should communicate in relation to climate-related financial disclosures.
Audience
Investors and financial institutions
Focus
Environmental and governance (single materiality)
Outcome
External report
The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) uses a combination of global- and industry-specific standards to identify ESG opportunities and risks most relevant to the financial performance of a specific industry. SASB standards are now under the oversight of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), as part of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation.
Audience
All stakeholders, but focused on investors
Focus
ESG, including double materiality
Outcome
External report
Where trade bodies and associations request ESG and sustainability reporting, they will often provide a bespoke submission template or index.
Organizations will need to assess which reporting framework/s will best help them meet the requirements that apply to them specifically.
Publicly disclosing your ESG and sustainability-related information involves publishing data points, metrics and claims, and opening them to potential scrutiny.
Some public disclosures will be mandatory, either due to legal regulation or trade body or association membership. Others will be voluntary and should be considered, depending on the benefits or opportunities they could unlock.
Each organization will have specific circumstances and priorities, which will determine their level of public reporting. Making this assessment should also include examining the ongoing time and resource required to understand reporting requirements, make informed decisions on how to proceed, and meet these commitments reasonably and efficiently.
Once you’ve determined the right level of public reporting, you will need to ensure the organization can manage the information required. This will include sourcing, collating and assuring the right information, as well as maintaining your reports over time.
To do this well, you’ll need to look at your processes, your people and the technology you employ. You may find that changes need to be made, and many organizations will need to undergo significant transformation to build an effective ESG and sustainability reporting capability.
This four-stage approach should help you gain greater clarity over your ESG and sustainability reporting. However, it’s important to note that this is not always a straightforward linear process, nor is it a one-and-done exercise. ESG and sustainability reporting is a changing landscape and organizations will need to continue monitoring both regulatory changes and any new benefits that reporting could help unlock.
By regularly revisiting our recommended key questions, you can ensure you keep ahead of new developments, assess what applies to your organization, and make the right, strategic decisions.
Share: